We expect the students to show up "loud and proud," essentially encourage them to be rowdy, if not drunk, then expect them to immediately cease being rowdy once the clock hits triple-zero? CU students essentially carry the stadium for 4 quarters then are expected to shut up, turn out the lights, and go back to their dorm rooms? I'm honestly surprised we're the only ones doing this on a semi-regular basis. What's there to protect? What's the harm?
(The aftermath of the Georgia game. From: Me)
Further, I absolutely disregard any contention that these students pose any risk to the opposing players and coaches. Ringo insinuates that there is no way for the opposing team to tell if the fans rushing the field mean harm: that's a load of stinky bullshit. Any human with half a brain knows exactly why those students is running on the field: to celebrate, not to attack. If there are any random trouble makers, what are they going to do? Punch a 300lb lineman in the face-mask?
Hell, even Hawk gets this. Ringo prodded him after the game, I'm sure with the intention of getting some reactionary parental concern out of him, and Hawk responded with a defense of the students and their new "tradition" of rushing the field.
"To me it`s just become sort of a tradition here a little bit. I think our student section is pretty dynamic and a big part of Folsom Field. I think it`s become more of a tradition and a fun thing and I hope it continues to stay like that."Hawk is damn right, it is a fun thing. The students in Folsom are more a part of the action than anywhere else in the country, and rushing the field is just a direct reflection of that.
Finally, Ringo runs into the enforcement wall. Ringo points out that in '06 "two fans suffered serious injuries -- a broken shoulder and broken leg -- in scuffles with security trying to prevent them from getting on the field." Even cops know it stupid to try and prevent 15,000 students from trying to do anything. CU police is now concerned with mitigation and protection of key assets (Goalposts, referees and opposing team members). They essentially just let that shit happen.
"We are not actively trying to stop it. What we look to do is set a presence where hopefully if they`re deciding and it`s not a 'We`re doing it` thing, maybe we can stop it. But if they`re going to come -- and we knew they were going to come in this game -- we`re basically there to have no one get hurt and make sure no one interacts with the visiting team."There is really no reason to stop this "tradition." If students want to get on the field, preventing them is only going to end up with someone getting hurt, and that's the last thing people want. Let the kids have their fun, slowly but surely send them to the exits (like they do), and move on.
2 comments:
The main problem I have with it is that the more it happens, the less it really means. But I also guess that the less special rushing the field becomes, the less the students will do it.
I just hope the administration doesn't start thinking that the student section is completely satisfied with the coaching situation and will keep Hawkins around if we crap the bed the rest of the season just because we beat a bad BCS team.
My point is why does it have to mean anything? Maybe its just something we do now: "Colorado won a close game; get on the fucking field." Honestly, I'm cool with that. It's college, who said anything about acting like you've been there before; there's a time and place for everything...
But you're right, they'll prolley stop doing it once it gets less cool. Soon it'll just be the freshmen and that'll kill it. OR, they'll start teaching not to do it in orientation just like how they've slowly killed "Fuck em up, Fuck em up, Go CU." The new generations actually say "Buffaloes, Buffaloes." ... NEEEERRRRRDS!
Don't worry, Hawk is still onthe chopping block. I think that's why he said what he did: he's got nothing to lose, he might as well be honest and say he enjoys something he enjoys.
Post a Comment